<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tucson&#8217;s two-tiered shaming	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/tucsons-two-tiered-shaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/tucsons-two-tiered-shaming/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Great moments in public employment: correctional officers&#039; many rights - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/tucsons-two-tiered-shaming/comment-page-1/#comment-327658</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Great moments in public employment: correctional officers&#039; many rights - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55259#comment-327658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to shield the identities of officers who use force.&#8221; [Watchdog] And with respect to our post of the other day, a commenter writes that the city of Tucson&#8217;s two-tiered informational release &#8212; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to shield the identities of officers who use force.&#8221; [Watchdog] And with respect to our post of the other day, a commenter writes that the city of Tucson&#8217;s two-tiered informational release &#8212; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Doe		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/09/tucsons-two-tiered-shaming/comment-page-1/#comment-327655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55259#comment-327655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Back when this first blew up, I tried to find the names because I wanted to see who was on it. I couldn&#039;t find the list anywhere. Eventually I found out that the names weren&#039;t &quot;released&quot;, the Arizona Daily Star requested the names from police records (under a public records transparency law.) The police redacted the officer names because under the law they were under active investigation, which is a legal exception carved out due to unions. I was never able to get the names, the paper wouldn&#039;t release them to me, and the cost for getting the records from the police was exorbitant (around 25 cents a page IIRC, and there was about 300 pages.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when this first blew up, I tried to find the names because I wanted to see who was on it. I couldn&#8217;t find the list anywhere. Eventually I found out that the names weren&#8217;t &#8220;released&#8221;, the Arizona Daily Star requested the names from police records (under a public records transparency law.) The police redacted the officer names because under the law they were under active investigation, which is a legal exception carved out due to unions. I was never able to get the names, the paper wouldn&#8217;t release them to me, and the cost for getting the records from the police was exorbitant (around 25 cents a page IIRC, and there was about 300 pages.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
