<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: L.A. eateries adopt surcharge for employee health, get charged with price fixing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/10/l-a-eateries-adopt-surcharge-for-employee-health-get-charged-with-price-fixing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/10/l-a-eateries-adopt-surcharge-for-employee-health-get-charged-with-price-fixing/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: gitarcarver		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/10/l-a-eateries-adopt-surcharge-for-employee-health-get-charged-with-price-fixing/comment-page-1/#comment-328361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gitarcarver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55453#comment-328361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/10/l-a-eateries-adopt-surcharge-for-employee-health-get-charged-with-price-fixing/comment-page-1/#comment-328337&quot;&gt;mx&lt;/a&gt;.

I am missing your point here.  If I want to get together with my fellow competition and form a restaurant association where recommendations on costs, charges, etc are made, but am free to adopt those recommendations or not, is that a crime as well?

If I see an owner of another store in my restaurant and he says &quot;what is this surcharge thing?&quot; and I explain it to him and he adopts it, are we guilty then as well?

Sorry, but this is a case where the government should butt the heck out.  This is not price fixing where prices for items are established across the board.  As the surcharge is based on a percentage, 3% on a Big Mac is going to be different than 3% on filet minion and a baked potato.

If people band together (that ol&#039; pesky Constitution thing) and decide to voluntarily add a surcharge, that is none of the government&#039;s business.  Not here,.  Not in this case.

If the government wants to run businesses, let them demonstrate how well they can do it because from where I sit, they cannot run or control any market worth crap.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/10/l-a-eateries-adopt-surcharge-for-employee-health-get-charged-with-price-fixing/comment-page-1/#comment-328337">mx</a>.</p>
<p>I am missing your point here.  If I want to get together with my fellow competition and form a restaurant association where recommendations on costs, charges, etc are made, but am free to adopt those recommendations or not, is that a crime as well?</p>
<p>If I see an owner of another store in my restaurant and he says &#8220;what is this surcharge thing?&#8221; and I explain it to him and he adopts it, are we guilty then as well?</p>
<p>Sorry, but this is a case where the government should butt the heck out.  This is not price fixing where prices for items are established across the board.  As the surcharge is based on a percentage, 3% on a Big Mac is going to be different than 3% on filet minion and a baked potato.</p>
<p>If people band together (that ol&#8217; pesky Constitution thing) and decide to voluntarily add a surcharge, that is none of the government&#8217;s business.  Not here,.  Not in this case.</p>
<p>If the government wants to run businesses, let them demonstrate how well they can do it because from where I sit, they cannot run or control any market worth crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mx		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/10/l-a-eateries-adopt-surcharge-for-employee-health-get-charged-with-price-fixing/comment-page-1/#comment-328337</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=55453#comment-328337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well of course you can&#039;t do that. Surcharges are pretty common in San Francisco, but every restaurant sets their own policy if they have a surcharge (either a percentage, with varies from restaurant to restaurant or sometimes a per-customer charge). It&#039;s perfectly reasonable for a restaurant to do this and owners can use their judgement of their customers and the market to set prices accordingly. But if they actually all sat down and agreed to 3% at the same time, that&#039;s very different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well of course you can&#8217;t do that. Surcharges are pretty common in San Francisco, but every restaurant sets their own policy if they have a surcharge (either a percentage, with varies from restaurant to restaurant or sometimes a per-customer charge). It&#8217;s perfectly reasonable for a restaurant to do this and owners can use their judgement of their customers and the market to set prices accordingly. But if they actually all sat down and agreed to 3% at the same time, that&#8217;s very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
