Consider that the plaintiff wants the door locked behind him so that no other customers may enter. Now imagine another customer showing up just after closing while the plaintiff is shopping, and asking to be let in to buy some emergency medical good. This is the making of yet another lawsuit.

Bob

There is a difference between allowing shoppers who are in the store to finish their shopping and allowing another person in the store after hours to shop.

The plaintiff says that other stores are willing to accommodate him. those stores include drug stores and pharmacies. Because those stores are willing to accommodate him means he has an outlet for his needs.

A store should have the right to set its hours and its policies. The idea of shopping after hours is a store decision and one the government should stay out of.

Part of the problem is that his white female friend only requested the ability to shop after hours. Mr Callum was also looking to have prescriptions filled.

I can’t speak to the area where Mr Callum lives, but in my area, at those CVS locations that aren’t open 24/7, the actual pharmacy closes almost at least an hour before they lock the doors (longer on Sundays). The actual pharmacists would be gone by the time the doors are locked.