<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Police and prosecution roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 05:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: From the comments: arrestees stay out? - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[From the comments: arrestees stay out? - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 05:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=56071#comment-329319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Commenter Gitarcarver on yesterday&#8217;s item about how some in the Charlotte Police Department have talked about designating &#8220;public safety zones&#8221; where persons who have previously been arrested would be forbidden to go: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Commenter Gitarcarver on yesterday&#8217;s item about how some in the Charlotte Police Department have talked about designating &#8220;public safety zones&#8221; where persons who have previously been arrested would be forbidden to go: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=56071#comment-329296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329291&quot;&gt;gitarcarver&lt;/a&gt;.

It make as much sense as anything else our government has done in the last 50 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329291">gitarcarver</a>.</p>
<p>It make as much sense as anything else our government has done in the last 50 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gitarcarver		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/police-and-prosecution-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gitarcarver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=56071#comment-329291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RE: Charlotte &quot;Safety&quot; Zones.

The City wants to make these zones based on arrests (not convictions.)  

At the same time, an employer cannot ask whether a person has been arrested.  Of course, there is now the push for &quot;ban the box&quot; which means an employer cannot ask about a conviction.

The City wants to say it can ban people and arrest people from public property, but those private companies can&#039;t even ask about those convictions (much less arrests) during the initial hiring process.

Yeah.

THAT makes sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Charlotte &#8220;Safety&#8221; Zones.</p>
<p>The City wants to make these zones based on arrests (not convictions.)  </p>
<p>At the same time, an employer cannot ask whether a person has been arrested.  Of course, there is now the push for &#8220;ban the box&#8221; which means an employer cannot ask about a conviction.</p>
<p>The City wants to say it can ban people and arrest people from public property, but those private companies can&#8217;t even ask about those convictions (much less arrests) during the initial hiring process.</p>
<p>Yeah.</p>
<p>THAT makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
