Comments on: EPA’s lobbying on “Waters of the United States”: no big deal?

By: Republican Presidential New Year’s Resolution: Shut Down the Ridiculous EPA | Somewhat Reasonable

Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:49:36 +0000

[…] EPA’s Lobbying on “Waters of the United States”: No Big Deal? […]

By: Republican Presidential New Year’s Resolution: Shut Down the Ridiculous EPA | Conservative Republican News

Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:59:03 +0000

[…] EPA’s Lobbying on “Waters of the United States”: No Big Deal? […]

By: Environment roundup - Overlawyered

Environment roundup - Overlawyered — Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:30:18 +0000

[…] the misuse of environmental history to defend the EPA’s WOTUS rule” [Jonathan Adler, earlier on Waters of the United States […]

By: kimsch

kimsch — Tue, 29 Dec 2015 07:24:52 +0000

My 10th of an acre lot, where I live in the small house built upon it, would be subject to EPA control of the WOTUS. I live 1200 feet from a lake (well within the 4000 foot limit), I have two storm drains in the curb in front of my house. A storm drain in the back on the fence line, and when it rains very hard, I have mini-lakes in both my front and back yards along with a river that runs down the south side of my house from the street to the back yard. ThIs just has to go.

By: My letter in the FNP on illegal EPA lobbying | Free State Notes

My letter in the FNP on illegal EPA lobbying | Free State Notes — Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:33:59 +0000

[…] So I wrote this letter in response, which ran today. There wasn’t space for me to dispute the FNP’s peculiar notion that to oppose the water rule as exceeding the EPA’s statutory authority is to encourage the “anti-science, climate change denial crowd,” which tends to reinforce my sense that “anti-science” and “climate denial” are turning into all-purpose epithets increasingly unhooked from any particular relationship to science or climate. (cross-posted from Overlawyered) […]