<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Britain prunes obsolete laws	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:34:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill H		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-332337</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=57162#comment-332337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can see it now being enforced: a red flag being walked 20 paces in front of your car as it hurtles down the motorway at a break-neck 3mph.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see it now being enforced: a red flag being walked 20 paces in front of your car as it hurtles down the motorway at a break-neck 3mph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David C		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-332258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=57162#comment-332258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No, it has a purpose.  

When the law has a bunch of ridiculous stuff in it, like not carrying a plank down a busy sidewalk, that might make the average person think that other seemingly ridiculous things in the law, like not making two $5000 cash deposits to your own bank account, are similarly not enforced.  They can find out the hard way which is which.  

Also, if you&#039;re trying to just read the law to find whether a certain thing is illegal, it helps to not have a bunch of stupid unenforced laws just cluttering up the statutes.  Getting rid of the deadwood is a good thing.  And maybe they&#039;re only pruning 0.5% of the laws, but something is better than nothing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it has a purpose.  </p>
<p>When the law has a bunch of ridiculous stuff in it, like not carrying a plank down a busy sidewalk, that might make the average person think that other seemingly ridiculous things in the law, like not making two $5000 cash deposits to your own bank account, are similarly not enforced.  They can find out the hard way which is which.  </p>
<p>Also, if you&#8217;re trying to just read the law to find whether a certain thing is illegal, it helps to not have a bunch of stupid unenforced laws just cluttering up the statutes.  Getting rid of the deadwood is a good thing.  And maybe they&#8217;re only pruning 0.5% of the laws, but something is better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-332257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=57162#comment-332257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-332248&quot;&gt;PaulB&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;d rather have the old laws off the books than rely of the good will of the police/prosecutors/judges to not enforce it. In addition it makes looking up current law easier as you do not have to sort through all the old trash. Personally I think most laws should have a built in expiration date.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-332248">PaulB</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather have the old laws off the books than rely of the good will of the police/prosecutors/judges to not enforce it. In addition it makes looking up current law easier as you do not have to sort through all the old trash. Personally I think most laws should have a built in expiration date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PaulB		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/01/britain-prunes-obsolete-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-332248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=57162#comment-332248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is the sort of action that sounds good but means nothing.  How many of these laws have ever been enforced in the last few years?  If I were a left wing busy body member of Congress, this is the sort of activity I would do to &quot;prove&quot; that i&#039;m a reasonable legislator.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the sort of action that sounds good but means nothing.  How many of these laws have ever been enforced in the last few years?  If I were a left wing busy body member of Congress, this is the sort of activity I would do to &#8220;prove&#8221; that i&#8217;m a reasonable legislator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
