<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Archfiend of misogyny steps forth, Internet calls cops	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/02/roosh-splc-misogyny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/02/roosh-splc-misogyny/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Keefe		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/02/roosh-splc-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-332968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Keefe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=57533#comment-332968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The SPLC sees an opportunity to agitate its huge donor base and will rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars by railing against &quot;pick-up artists.&quot; (Really? &quot;Pick-up artists&quot;? Dr. Beirich must have watched too many episodes of &quot;Mad Men.&quot;)

The SPLC dropped the &quot;non-profit civil rights organization&quot; descriptor from its website in 2004. It now refers to itself as &quot;an advocacy group&quot; in its press releases and other fundraising materials, just like any other special interest group.

http://wp.me/pCLYZ-pE

This frees the company to go after the most inane topics-du-jour without having to make any attempt at linking their actions to civil rights. 

Last year the donors sent the company more than $54 million tax-free dollars, do Dr. Beirich&#039;s &quot;advocacy&quot; campaign is doing something right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SPLC sees an opportunity to agitate its huge donor base and will rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars by railing against &#8220;pick-up artists.&#8221; (Really? &#8220;Pick-up artists&#8221;? Dr. Beirich must have watched too many episodes of &#8220;Mad Men.&#8221;)</p>
<p>The SPLC dropped the &#8220;non-profit civil rights organization&#8221; descriptor from its website in 2004. It now refers to itself as &#8220;an advocacy group&#8221; in its press releases and other fundraising materials, just like any other special interest group.</p>
<p><a href="http://wp.me/pCLYZ-pE" rel="nofollow ugc">http://wp.me/pCLYZ-pE</a></p>
<p>This frees the company to go after the most inane topics-du-jour without having to make any attempt at linking their actions to civil rights. </p>
<p>Last year the donors sent the company more than $54 million tax-free dollars, do Dr. Beirich&#8217;s &#8220;advocacy&#8221; campaign is doing something right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
