If the answer to either question is no, other politicians ought to get to work on that. Pronto.

The rule of law at the border has been disregarded, but I don’t think that it has in the way you imply. When the northern half of Vermont and New Hampshire, to name just two states, are considered to be “border zones” where the 4th amendment does not apply, because the border patrol considers the border to extend 100 miles into the interior of the country, then the Constitutional freedoms guaranteed to us all are being destroyed, and the rule of law obliterated.

Somehow, I don’t think Trump, who has reportedly taken great advantage of the labor of undocumented workers, despite his current rhetoric, is the one who will roll back this attack on the constitution. Trump is probably the biggest threat to American democracy since Huey Long.

A highly ironic comment, when the rule of law at the border has been completely disregarded for so long that Trump is considered an “extremist” for declaring he will enforce it once again.

There’s nothing wrong with suing someone when you have a case. There IS something wrong with suing someone when you know you can’t win, just to make them pay legal fees.

Bob