<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Affirmative action hiring for the disabled	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:53:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58206#comment-334665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I worked extensively in the retail industry&#039;s lobbying efforts for the ADA in 1989 until its passage. All proponents of the legislation assured all who inquired that if the law passed, it would never require affirmative action. I pointed out that the same assurances were made before passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but was told my fears were misplaced. As Yogi Berra once said, &quot;It&#039;s Deja vu all over again!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked extensively in the retail industry&#8217;s lobbying efforts for the ADA in 1989 until its passage. All proponents of the legislation assured all who inquired that if the law passed, it would never require affirmative action. I pointed out that the same assurances were made before passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but was told my fears were misplaced. As Yogi Berra once said, &#8220;It&#8217;s Deja vu all over again!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Biggar		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334583</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Biggar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58206#comment-334583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Where did they get the 12% and 2% numbers?  Where is the evidence that that&#039;s even close to the actual population stats?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did they get the 12% and 2% numbers?  Where is the evidence that that&#8217;s even close to the actual population stats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bob		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58206#comment-334573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334548&quot;&gt;DensityDuck&lt;/a&gt;.

uh, the ADAAA already took care of making everyone over age 35 disabled under the law.  It&#039;s really a joke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334548">DensityDuck</a>.</p>
<p>uh, the ADAAA already took care of making everyone over age 35 disabled under the law.  It&#8217;s really a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58206#comment-334548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I see a coming explosion in the number of Americans with disabilities.  This is because more and more people will be defined as &quot;disabled&quot; in order to meet this requirement.  Whole categories of things now only vaguely recognized as issues will be swept into &quot;disabled&quot;.  Social anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, restless-legs syndrome; you got these, now you&#039;re disabled.

And in their quest to meet the Five-Year Production Plan goals, even more things will be declared indicative of disability.  Wear thick glasses?  Visual impairment!  Can&#039;t climb stairs quickly (because you&#039;re fat)?  Mobility impairment!  Heartburn from spicy food?  Digestive disorder!  Can&#039;t manage to add two numbers together and get the same answer twice?  Cognitive impairment!

And, of course, these definitions will be applied to vast swathes of Americans who will now be counted as &quot;disabled&quot;, giving us even more reason to insist that the ADA be applied to grind down all distinctiveness into a flat, bland, gray soup.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a coming explosion in the number of Americans with disabilities.  This is because more and more people will be defined as &#8220;disabled&#8221; in order to meet this requirement.  Whole categories of things now only vaguely recognized as issues will be swept into &#8220;disabled&#8221;.  Social anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, restless-legs syndrome; you got these, now you&#8217;re disabled.</p>
<p>And in their quest to meet the Five-Year Production Plan goals, even more things will be declared indicative of disability.  Wear thick glasses?  Visual impairment!  Can&#8217;t climb stairs quickly (because you&#8217;re fat)?  Mobility impairment!  Heartburn from spicy food?  Digestive disorder!  Can&#8217;t manage to add two numbers together and get the same answer twice?  Cognitive impairment!</p>
<p>And, of course, these definitions will be applied to vast swathes of Americans who will now be counted as &#8220;disabled&#8221;, giving us even more reason to insist that the ADA be applied to grind down all distinctiveness into a flat, bland, gray soup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58206#comment-334546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334545&quot;&gt;Gregory Dwyer&lt;/a&gt;.

I believe this particular round is for federal agencies as distinct from companies, though the question remains equally interesting in either case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334545">Gregory Dwyer</a>.</p>
<p>I believe this particular round is for federal agencies as distinct from companies, though the question remains equally interesting in either case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gregory Dwyer		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/affirmative-action-hiring-for-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-334545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58206#comment-334545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And how are companies supposed to figure this out when it&#039;s against federal law to ask someone in an interview if the person has a disability?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how are companies supposed to figure this out when it&#8217;s against federal law to ask someone in an interview if the person has a disability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
