Comments on: An eight-Justice Supreme Court https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/an-eight-justice-supreme-court/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:45:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: Today's not-that-big SCOTUS nomination story - Overlawyered https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/an-eight-justice-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-334262 Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:45:42 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=58043#comment-334262 […] political strategy to maximize press coverage in this way.) Jonathan Adler points out, as have others, that the Senate’s advise-and-consent role does not generate any constitutional duty to […]

]]> By: Allan https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/03/an-eight-justice-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-334082 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:13:22 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=58043#comment-334082 I’m game:

Good thing that is unconstitutional: the line item veto (it might help get rid of these omnibus bills).

Bad thing that is constitutional: laws that regulate small intra-state transactions (under the commerce clause, e.g., the transactions in Wickard v. Fillmore).

]]>