No, we did not.

I disagree.

An argument can be made that once impeachment proceedings have started, the proceedings themselves are called “impeachment.”

However, that not withstanding, the Constitution says “The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.”

Once the House voted to impeach Clinton, he was “impeached.” The Senates vote has no bearing on whether Clinton was impeached. Once again, referring to the Constitution: “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.”

It is difficult to say that Clinton was not impeached as if he was not, the Senate had no right to vote or conduct a trial as they did.

“Didn’t we just recently impeach a sitting President for a similar circumstance?”

No, we did not. The House issued a bill of impeachment, but the Senate rejected it.

It isn’t the sex. It was the hiding of facts relevant to the case. .Didn’t we just recently impeach a sitting President for a similar circumstance? Not that it seems to matter much. All most people see is the word “sex”. Past that, nothing apparently matters.