<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Environment roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/environment-roundup-33/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/environment-roundup-33/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 11:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: VMS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/environment-roundup-33/comment-page-1/#comment-336340</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 11:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58924#comment-336340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Mike. People even go so far as to set up a separate corporation or trust to own the adjacent lot so it is not commonly owned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike. People even go so far as to set up a separate corporation or trust to own the adjacent lot so it is not commonly owned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/environment-roundup-33/comment-page-1/#comment-336318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58924#comment-336318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re Murr... I do understand their problem and sympathize, but the doctrine of merger of commonly owned abutting lots is pretty widely known here in New York, and people will &quot;checkerboard&quot; ownership of lots to avoid just that. Perhaps these people should have taken some steps to protect their property.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Murr&#8230; I do understand their problem and sympathize, but the doctrine of merger of commonly owned abutting lots is pretty widely known here in New York, and people will &#8220;checkerboard&#8221; ownership of lots to avoid just that. Perhaps these people should have taken some steps to protect their property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/environment-roundup-33/comment-page-1/#comment-336316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 13:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58924#comment-336316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have to wonder if by combining the two lots did the value of the combined lots increase to more that the individual lots&#039; value added together?

Our County has combined adjacent lots owned by the same owner at the request of some School Districts.  The combined lots have a higher value that the sum of the individual lots, thus allowing the districts to tax the lots at the higher value.

I&#039;m an officer of a veteran&#039;s club that is trying to buy an adjacent lot to increase our parking area.  The owner is willing to sell, but, found out that three of his lots have been combined, without his knowledge.  The County is willing to break up the lots to their original configuration, but, the School District is contesting it.  Veteran&#039;s organizations pay no property taxes, so if we buy the lot that brings down the overall value of the remaining lots and the District loses tax money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder if by combining the two lots did the value of the combined lots increase to more that the individual lots&#8217; value added together?</p>
<p>Our County has combined adjacent lots owned by the same owner at the request of some School Districts.  The combined lots have a higher value that the sum of the individual lots, thus allowing the districts to tax the lots at the higher value.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an officer of a veteran&#8217;s club that is trying to buy an adjacent lot to increase our parking area.  The owner is willing to sell, but, found out that three of his lots have been combined, without his knowledge.  The County is willing to break up the lots to their original configuration, but, the School District is contesting it.  Veteran&#8217;s organizations pay no property taxes, so if we buy the lot that brings down the overall value of the remaining lots and the District loses tax money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
