<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: An Oklahoma forfeiture story	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/oklahoma-forfeiture-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/oklahoma-forfeiture-story/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 20:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/oklahoma-forfeiture-story/comment-page-1/#comment-335911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58957#comment-335911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reforming the statutes is all well and good, but short of eliminating civil forfeiture, I don&#039;t see how it will help. Why should we expect raising the standard of proof of criminality to help if so many cases, such as this one, plainly do meet even the current low standard of preponderance of evidence? How will it help if courts are willing to accept the ridiculous inference from &quot;dog alerts to car&quot; to &quot;cash was used by bearer in drug transaction&quot;?

Indeed, what bothers me most about these cases is that they seem to reflect a widespread culture of corruption among the police, prosecutors, and courts. Prosecutors and judges, at least, have a certain level of education and are selected in part on the basis of intelligence. Is it really plausible that so many of these people sincerely believe the absurd claims they swear to in civil forfeiture proceedings?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reforming the statutes is all well and good, but short of eliminating civil forfeiture, I don&#8217;t see how it will help. Why should we expect raising the standard of proof of criminality to help if so many cases, such as this one, plainly do meet even the current low standard of preponderance of evidence? How will it help if courts are willing to accept the ridiculous inference from &#8220;dog alerts to car&#8221; to &#8220;cash was used by bearer in drug transaction&#8221;?</p>
<p>Indeed, what bothers me most about these cases is that they seem to reflect a widespread culture of corruption among the police, prosecutors, and courts. Prosecutors and judges, at least, have a certain level of education and are selected in part on the basis of intelligence. Is it really plausible that so many of these people sincerely believe the absurd claims they swear to in civil forfeiture proceedings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Al		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/oklahoma-forfeiture-story/comment-page-1/#comment-335902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 12:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=58957#comment-335902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Let it go Jake....It&#039;s Oklahoma&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let it go Jake&#8230;.It&#8217;s Oklahoma&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
