<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Liability roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/liability-roundup-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/liability-roundup-18/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/liability-roundup-18/comment-page-1/#comment-337366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59086#comment-337366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re:  Undercover Defense Attorney.  I recall seeing plaintiff-side conferences where it said, in big bold letters, &quot;defense attorneys may not attend.&quot;  What&#039;s there to hide?  Nothing dirty going on, I trust?  Can they even do that?  I suppose they can, but it&#039;s like political parties:  quasi-private, quasi-public.  Or like an ex parte communication, if judges are there.  Has the bar weighed in on conferences that affirmatively exclude certain attorneys?  Could we get a legal ethics opinion on that?  Could a journalist get in?  Ah, but journalists aren&#039;t skeptical of the plaintiff&#039;s bar, so never mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Undercover Defense Attorney.  I recall seeing plaintiff-side conferences where it said, in big bold letters, &#8220;defense attorneys may not attend.&#8221;  What&#8217;s there to hide?  Nothing dirty going on, I trust?  Can they even do that?  I suppose they can, but it&#8217;s like political parties:  quasi-private, quasi-public.  Or like an ex parte communication, if judges are there.  Has the bar weighed in on conferences that affirmatively exclude certain attorneys?  Could we get a legal ethics opinion on that?  Could a journalist get in?  Ah, but journalists aren&#8217;t skeptical of the plaintiff&#8217;s bar, so never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/liability-roundup-18/comment-page-1/#comment-337234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59086#comment-337234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am not sure anyone was deceived by containers that don&#039;t leave some residue of the product behind on the sides and bottoms of containers. 

Also, printer ink, anyone?  I have made quite a mess taking apart print cartridges that are reported to be empty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure anyone was deceived by containers that don&#8217;t leave some residue of the product behind on the sides and bottoms of containers. </p>
<p>Also, printer ink, anyone?  I have made quite a mess taking apart print cartridges that are reported to be empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
