<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Payday lending crackdown continues	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/payday-lending-crackdown-full-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/payday-lending-crackdown-full-force/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:49:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill H		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/payday-lending-crackdown-full-force/comment-page-1/#comment-337545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59728#comment-337545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; To prevent potentially corrupting mission creep by a taxpayer-subsidized competitor, we could ban the post office from lucrative sectors like credit cards and checking.&lt;/i&gt;

The idea of using the USPS as a simple savings account service has some merit, but if you exclude the more lucrative ways for the USPS to make at least break-even money on this, just how is it supposed to be paid for? Even in it&#039;s simplest form, someone has to administrate it. You need to pay for all the accoutrements of running a business. I can see banning the credit card industry- USPS has problems enough. But by what vehicle do you see this happening?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> To prevent potentially corrupting mission creep by a taxpayer-subsidized competitor, we could ban the post office from lucrative sectors like credit cards and checking.</i></p>
<p>The idea of using the USPS as a simple savings account service has some merit, but if you exclude the more lucrative ways for the USPS to make at least break-even money on this, just how is it supposed to be paid for? Even in it&#8217;s simplest form, someone has to administrate it. You need to pay for all the accoutrements of running a business. I can see banning the credit card industry- USPS has problems enough. But by what vehicle do you see this happening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/payday-lending-crackdown-full-force/comment-page-1/#comment-337509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59728#comment-337509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There would be less demand for exorbitant recycling payday debt, if hand-to-mouth consumers were encouraged to put aside small savings out of reach of importunate  relatives and roommates.  When I was a kid around 1960, it was possible to set up an interest-paying, no-fee passbook savings account with just a few dollars.  The Federal government encouraged small savings by exempting the first $100 from income tax.

Nowadays, banks either refuse small accounts or saddle them with heavy fees.  Like many foreign countries, we should use our widely distributed network of post offices as a convenient savings depository.  To prevent potentially corrupting mission creep by a taxpayer-subsidized competitor, we could ban the post office from lucrative sectors like credit cards and checking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There would be less demand for exorbitant recycling payday debt, if hand-to-mouth consumers were encouraged to put aside small savings out of reach of importunate  relatives and roommates.  When I was a kid around 1960, it was possible to set up an interest-paying, no-fee passbook savings account with just a few dollars.  The Federal government encouraged small savings by exempting the first $100 from income tax.</p>
<p>Nowadays, banks either refuse small accounts or saddle them with heavy fees.  Like many foreign countries, we should use our widely distributed network of post offices as a convenient savings depository.  To prevent potentially corrupting mission creep by a taxpayer-subsidized competitor, we could ban the post office from lucrative sectors like credit cards and checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wilbur		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/payday-lending-crackdown-full-force/comment-page-1/#comment-337508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilbur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59728#comment-337508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why shouldn&#039;t she?  It&#039;s an area of expertise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why shouldn&#8217;t she?  It&#8217;s an area of expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gregory Dwyer		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/06/payday-lending-crackdown-full-force/comment-page-1/#comment-337505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59728#comment-337505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it amusing that Elizabeth Warren is investigating them for falsely claiming affiliation with an American Indian tribe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that Elizabeth Warren is investigating them for falsely claiming affiliation with an American Indian tribe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
