<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Baltimore County to consider bill forcing landlords to take Section 8	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/baltimore-county-section-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/baltimore-county-section-8/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2016 01:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Will Baltimore County force landlords to take Section 8? &#124; Free State Notes		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/baltimore-county-section-8/comment-page-1/#comment-338995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Baltimore County force landlords to take Section 8? &#124; Free State Notes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=60155#comment-338995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] In Baltimore County, county executive Kevin Kamenetz has introduced a bill to ban “housing voucher discrimination,” that is to say, a bill requiring landlords to take Section 8 tenants. “Kamenetz is required to introduce the bill as part of a housing discrimination settlement with the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development that was reached this year. … If [it] does not pass the County Council, the HUD settlement requires it to be reintroduced in future years.” Landlords and property owners say that it is unfair to force them to enroll against their will in a program with cumbersome paperwork and inspections. [Pamela Wood, Baltimore Sun] HUD is now arm-twisting jurisdictions nationwide into enacting these bad laws; earlier here (bad renter trashes unit), here, etc. [cross-posted from Overlawyered] [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Baltimore County, county executive Kevin Kamenetz has introduced a bill to ban “housing voucher discrimination,” that is to say, a bill requiring landlords to take Section 8 tenants. “Kamenetz is required to introduce the bill as part of a housing discrimination settlement with the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development that was reached this year. … If [it] does not pass the County Council, the HUD settlement requires it to be reintroduced in future years.” Landlords and property owners say that it is unfair to force them to enroll against their will in a program with cumbersome paperwork and inspections. [Pamela Wood, Baltimore Sun] HUD is now arm-twisting jurisdictions nationwide into enacting these bad laws; earlier here (bad renter trashes unit), here, etc. [cross-posted from Overlawyered] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EH		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/baltimore-county-section-8/comment-page-1/#comment-338852</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=60155#comment-338852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FYI, this is already the law in Massachusetts.  So if you&#039;re looking for a direct comparison instead of speculation that would be a good place to start.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, this is already the law in Massachusetts.  So if you&#8217;re looking for a direct comparison instead of speculation that would be a good place to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/baltimore-county-section-8/comment-page-1/#comment-338820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=60155#comment-338820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another problem with coerced settlements.  The federal judge who approved the settlement should vacate the anti-democratic &quot;introduce the bill&quot; piece.  Why anti-democratic--because it cannot immediately be repealed (HUD would get a restraining order) and it goes to the head of the line from the standpoint of bill introduction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem with coerced settlements.  The federal judge who approved the settlement should vacate the anti-democratic &#8220;introduce the bill&#8221; piece.  Why anti-democratic&#8211;because it cannot immediately be repealed (HUD would get a restraining order) and it goes to the head of the line from the standpoint of bill introduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Ozenne		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/baltimore-county-section-8/comment-page-1/#comment-338819</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Ozenne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=60155#comment-338819</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would landlords be allowed to reject applications based on employment,credit rating, past rental history?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would landlords be allowed to reject applications based on employment,credit rating, past rental history?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
