<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Environment roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/environment-roundup-34/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/environment-roundup-34/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/environment-roundup-34/comment-page-1/#comment-338854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59899#comment-338854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When it comes to Greenpeace, I always thought that the French had the right idea, they just botched the execution a bit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Greenpeace, I always thought that the French had the right idea, they just botched the execution a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jdgalt		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/environment-roundup-34/comment-page-1/#comment-338824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdgalt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59899#comment-338824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t buy that first item.  Climate dissent is not grounds for charging anyone with fraud.  Trying to so charge them &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; grounds for serious charges itself, and must be punished severely if we&#039;re not to see the law misused this way again and again by other prosecutors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy that first item.  Climate dissent is not grounds for charging anyone with fraud.  Trying to so charge them <b>is</b> grounds for serious charges itself, and must be punished severely if we&#8217;re not to see the law misused this way again and again by other prosecutors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/environment-roundup-34/comment-page-1/#comment-338821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59899#comment-338821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the subpoenas and questioning of the left-wing groups are tightly controlled, then there shouldn&#039;t be a problem.  Congress has every right to investigate collusion between left-wing advocacy groups and state AGs.  (Congress really should call the state AGs also.)

It really only should be for testimony, and the GOP shouldn&#039;t emulate these thuggish tactics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the subpoenas and questioning of the left-wing groups are tightly controlled, then there shouldn&#8217;t be a problem.  Congress has every right to investigate collusion between left-wing advocacy groups and state AGs.  (Congress really should call the state AGs also.)</p>
<p>It really only should be for testimony, and the GOP shouldn&#8217;t emulate these thuggish tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
