<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rethinking minimum parking requirements	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/rethinking-minimum-parking-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/rethinking-minimum-parking-requirements/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/07/rethinking-minimum-parking-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-339182</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=60322#comment-339182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As someone who lived until recently in a city neighborhood that enforces parking-oriented development restrictions, I found this a case where good-government and libertarian concerns collide directly with self-interest.  On the free market, we would have had to pay on the order of $8,000/year after taxes to park one car.  That covers an awful lot of tax increases, and/or legal fees of the neighborhood association to protect the status quo...

The year I left, they allowed a high rise-apartment building on the condition tenants would *not* be eligible for resident parking.  Supposedly, there is a market for affluent millennial who are happy to do without cars.  Time will tell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who lived until recently in a city neighborhood that enforces parking-oriented development restrictions, I found this a case where good-government and libertarian concerns collide directly with self-interest.  On the free market, we would have had to pay on the order of $8,000/year after taxes to park one car.  That covers an awful lot of tax increases, and/or legal fees of the neighborhood association to protect the status quo&#8230;</p>
<p>The year I left, they allowed a high rise-apartment building on the condition tenants would *not* be eligible for resident parking.  Supposedly, there is a market for affluent millennial who are happy to do without cars.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
