<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Medical roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 18:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/comment-page-1/#comment-340715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=60740#comment-340715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/comment-page-1/#comment-340706&quot;&gt;Max Kennerly&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;When it comes to drumming up complaints about trial lawyers, adverse event reports are dispositive proof.&quot;

The article in question is not talking about adverse event reports as evidence, dispositive or otherwise, for anything.

What it is talking about is a number of studies that show that a significant number of people are frightened into going off medications without first consulting their personal doctors, not by adverse event reports, but by TV ads put out by law firms looking to either drum up clients or claimants for a civil suit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/comment-page-1/#comment-340706">Max Kennerly</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;When it comes to drumming up complaints about trial lawyers, adverse event reports are dispositive proof.&#8221;</p>
<p>The article in question is not talking about adverse event reports as evidence, dispositive or otherwise, for anything.</p>
<p>What it is talking about is a number of studies that show that a significant number of people are frightened into going off medications without first consulting their personal doctors, not by adverse event reports, but by TV ads put out by law firms looking to either drum up clients or claimants for a civil suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Max Kennerly		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/comment-page-1/#comment-340706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennerly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=60740#comment-340706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When it comes to drug side effects, the pharmaceutical industry is adamant that adverse event reports are useless, misleading, filled with errors, and impossible to verify.

When it comes to drumming up complaints about trial lawyers, adverse event reports are dispositive proof.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to drug side effects, the pharmaceutical industry is adamant that adverse event reports are useless, misleading, filled with errors, and impossible to verify.</p>
<p>When it comes to drumming up complaints about trial lawyers, adverse event reports are dispositive proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/medical-roundup-43/comment-page-1/#comment-340673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=60740#comment-340673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;my own in-person investigation&quot;

Best wishes Walter!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;my own in-person investigation&#8221;</p>
<p>Best wishes Walter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
