<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Media law roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/11/media-law-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/11/media-law-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/11/media-law-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-342918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=61315#comment-342918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Non-party being subjected to a court order--doesn&#039;t Martin v. Wilks control in the absence of legislation and notice?  &quot;It is a fundamental principle of Anglo-American jurisprudence that one cannot be bound by a proceeding to which it is a party.&quot;  That that statement was in a 5-4 decision (and not 9-0) apotheosizes the lack of a commitment to the rule of law on the part of the Court&#039;s liberal wing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Non-party being subjected to a court order&#8211;doesn&#8217;t Martin v. Wilks control in the absence of legislation and notice?  &#8220;It is a fundamental principle of Anglo-American jurisprudence that one cannot be bound by a proceeding to which it is a party.&#8221;  That that statement was in a 5-4 decision (and not 9-0) apotheosizes the lack of a commitment to the rule of law on the part of the Court&#8217;s liberal wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
