<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Police and prosecution roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/12/police-prosecution-roundup-32/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/12/police-prosecution-roundup-32/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/12/police-prosecution-roundup-32/comment-page-1/#comment-343508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=61488#comment-343508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Mike--

Out of curiosity, I checked Above the Law&#039;s site and it does indeed have the article you mentioned.  But I can understand why Walter would prefer to ignore it rather than risk hosting a racially tinged flame war here.  As folks expect to be advising our commander in chief for the next four years:  focus!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike&#8211;</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, I checked Above the Law&#8217;s site and it does indeed have the article you mentioned.  But I can understand why Walter would prefer to ignore it rather than risk hosting a racially tinged flame war here.  As folks expect to be advising our commander in chief for the next four years:  focus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/12/police-prosecution-roundup-32/comment-page-1/#comment-343500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=61488#comment-343500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding &quot;Police and Prosecution Roundup&quot;:


I&#039;m a little surprised that you have not linked to Elie Mystal&#039;s December 7, 2016, jury nullification proposal in &quot;Above the Law.&quot;

It is the most remarkable thing I have ever seen penned by a lawyer.

Mr. Mystal proposes that black jurors refuse to convict any black person of any crime against white men (he does fudge a bit on whether this includes white women and whites below the age of majority, presumably to avoid blow-back).

Property crimes? Yup.
Assault and battery? Check.
Murder? Yup.

In essence, he would declare &quot;open season&quot; on whites.

Until reading this, I assumed that Above the Law was a more or less credible publication, and that I could trust its attorney writers to discuss subjects of interest to their fellow attorneys in a rational way.

Mr. Mystal&#039;s hate-filled screed should make the website consider editing his contributions, not just for the usual stuff, like clarity and continuity, but for sanity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;Police and Prosecution Roundup&#8221;:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little surprised that you have not linked to Elie Mystal&#8217;s December 7, 2016, jury nullification proposal in &#8220;Above the Law.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is the most remarkable thing I have ever seen penned by a lawyer.</p>
<p>Mr. Mystal proposes that black jurors refuse to convict any black person of any crime against white men (he does fudge a bit on whether this includes white women and whites below the age of majority, presumably to avoid blow-back).</p>
<p>Property crimes? Yup.<br />
Assault and battery? Check.<br />
Murder? Yup.</p>
<p>In essence, he would declare &#8220;open season&#8221; on whites.</p>
<p>Until reading this, I assumed that Above the Law was a more or less credible publication, and that I could trust its attorney writers to discuss subjects of interest to their fellow attorneys in a rational way.</p>
<p>Mr. Mystal&#8217;s hate-filled screed should make the website consider editing his contributions, not just for the usual stuff, like clarity and continuity, but for sanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/12/police-prosecution-roundup-32/comment-page-1/#comment-343494</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=61488#comment-343494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry! Fixed now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry! Fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Ayers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/12/police-prosecution-roundup-32/comment-page-1/#comment-343492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Ayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=61488#comment-343492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Link to the Telegraph article is missing a letter.

Really is
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/05/now-dame-lowell-has-quit-the-great-child-abuse-inquiry-should-st/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link to the Telegraph article is missing a letter.</p>
<p>Really is<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/05/now-dame-lowell-has-quit-the-great-child-abuse-inquiry-should-st/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/05/now-dame-lowell-has-quit-the-great-child-abuse-inquiry-should-st/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
