<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fighting the last war, on courts and executive power	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/fighting-last-war-courts-executive-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/fighting-last-war-courts-executive-power/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:51:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: markm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/fighting-last-war-courts-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-343758</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62214#comment-343758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say the problem with the overtime ruling isn&#039;t an activist judge, but a DOL that failed to follow the legal process for rule changes, and also made an unjustifiably large and sudden change - there&#039;s no way that the DOL can argue that doubling the limit in one step is required by inflation unless they admit to being derelict in the 7 years under the same administration that they didn&#039;t change it. 

This last-minute reversal leaves employers who were making changes to conform to the new rule in a tough spot, but that&#039;s the DOL&#039;s fault for trying to force through to big an increase on too short of a time scale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the problem with the overtime ruling isn&#8217;t an activist judge, but a DOL that failed to follow the legal process for rule changes, and also made an unjustifiably large and sudden change &#8211; there&#8217;s no way that the DOL can argue that doubling the limit in one step is required by inflation unless they admit to being derelict in the 7 years under the same administration that they didn&#8217;t change it. </p>
<p>This last-minute reversal leaves employers who were making changes to conform to the new rule in a tough spot, but that&#8217;s the DOL&#8217;s fault for trying to force through to big an increase on too short of a time scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boblipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/fighting-last-war-courts-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-343661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boblipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 12:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62214#comment-343661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A strong judiciary is a good thing. An activist judiciary is a bad thing.  A strong judiciary restrains your opponents.  An activist judiciary restrains your allies.

Bad, bad activist judiciary!

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A strong judiciary is a good thing. An activist judiciary is a bad thing.  A strong judiciary restrains your opponents.  An activist judiciary restrains your allies.</p>
<p>Bad, bad activist judiciary!</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
