Comments on: Obama’s limp win rate at SCOTUS https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/obamas-limp-win-rate-scotus/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:17:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: jimf https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/obamas-limp-win-rate-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-343946 Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:17:24 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62866#comment-343946 I believe that Obama’s win rate is positively correlated with his policy of ruling by Executive Order and using Executive Agencies to issue rules which infringe on the Congressional responsibility to pass laws.

]]> By: Overlawyered's 50,000th comment - Overlawyered https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/obamas-limp-win-rate-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-343928 Tue, 24 Jan 2017 05:30:05 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62866#comment-343928 […] 50,000th approved comment is this one, by Gitarcarver late yesterday. Thank you to our commenters, both veteran and new, who add greatly […]

]]> By: gitarcarver https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/obamas-limp-win-rate-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-343926 Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:44:16 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62866#comment-343926 Wouldn’t Lee v. Tam be on the Obama administration as well?

In other words, I don’t think the record is finished yet.

]]> By: Kurt https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/obamas-limp-win-rate-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-343925 Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:54:32 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62866#comment-343925 I have a feeling that Trump’s percentage will be even lower.

]]>