<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: March 8 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/03/march-8-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/03/march-8-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 14:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Rohan		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/03/march-8-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-344568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Rohan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 14:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=63343#comment-344568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[About the Utah woman suing herself - aren&#039;t there two other problems not addressed in that article?: 

1) It&#039;s a clear conflict of interest to be both plaintiff and defendant, not to mention a waste of the state&#039;s time.

2) Aren&#039;t there statutes that prohibit people from profiting off crimes? I&#039;m not sure if her contribution to the accident was criminal, but seems like the same principle should apply. 

But it&#039;s not like this is the first time this has ever happened. I saw it in my own family. Way back in the 80s, a relative of mine caused an accident which severely injured her own child. So the child sued her mom for damages. As the child&#039;s guardian, of course the woman handled the case for her, even though she was also the person who caused the accident. In effect, she got a huge settlement from an action that she caused. This was back in the 80s, and I was a child myself, but it sounded really fishy to me at the time. It still does.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the Utah woman suing herself &#8211; aren&#8217;t there two other problems not addressed in that article?: </p>
<p>1) It&#8217;s a clear conflict of interest to be both plaintiff and defendant, not to mention a waste of the state&#8217;s time.</p>
<p>2) Aren&#8217;t there statutes that prohibit people from profiting off crimes? I&#8217;m not sure if her contribution to the accident was criminal, but seems like the same principle should apply. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not like this is the first time this has ever happened. I saw it in my own family. Way back in the 80s, a relative of mine caused an accident which severely injured her own child. So the child sued her mom for damages. As the child&#8217;s guardian, of course the woman handled the case for her, even though she was also the person who caused the accident. In effect, she got a huge settlement from an action that she caused. This was back in the 80s, and I was a child myself, but it sounded really fishy to me at the time. It still does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
