<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How expansively should courts define an ADA &#8220;place of public accommodation&#8221;?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/expansively-courts-define-ada-place-public-accommodation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/expansively-courts-define-ada-place-public-accommodation/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cecil		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/expansively-courts-define-ada-place-public-accommodation/comment-page-1/#comment-345495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cecil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=64085#comment-345495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since section 508 was signed into law and it covers specifically web accessibility and other things for federal procurement, use, development, etc...  Doesn&#039;t that pretty well establish that it isn&#039;t in ADA?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since section 508 was signed into law and it covers specifically web accessibility and other things for federal procurement, use, development, etc&#8230;  Doesn&#8217;t that pretty well establish that it isn&#8217;t in ADA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Regret		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/expansively-courts-define-ada-place-public-accommodation/comment-page-1/#comment-345486</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=64085#comment-345486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;[T]he high court has not resolved that question.&quot;  What irritates me most about these laws is that once written, Congress sits on their hands as the Courts interpret the laws however they wish over the next few decades.  Unlike Ten Commandments written on stone... these laws can be rewritten if they are not perfectly clear.  It&#039;d be better if the Court handed back the law back to Congress marked &quot;Incomplete&quot; and asked them to come see them during office hours next week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[T]he high court has not resolved that question.&#8221;  What irritates me most about these laws is that once written, Congress sits on their hands as the Courts interpret the laws however they wish over the next few decades.  Unlike Ten Commandments written on stone&#8230; these laws can be rewritten if they are not perfectly clear.  It&#8217;d be better if the Court handed back the law back to Congress marked &#8220;Incomplete&#8221; and asked them to come see them during office hours next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
