Comments on: Before bringing a monkey into the courthouse in your purse, read this https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/05/bringing-monkey-courthouse-purse-read/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 31 May 2017 02:02:26 +0000 hourly 1 By: Walter Olson https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/05/bringing-monkey-courthouse-purse-read/comment-page-1/#comment-345874 Wed, 31 May 2017 02:02:26 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=64654#comment-345874 In reply to Mark Biggar.

The linked Lowering the Bar article makes the case that no, it shouldn’t mean that. See in particular his argument under the heading “Fourth.”

]]> By: Mark Biggar https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/05/bringing-monkey-courthouse-purse-read/comment-page-1/#comment-345873 Wed, 31 May 2017 01:51:05 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=64654#comment-345873 “Emotional-support Animal”, is that just a fancy way of saying “pet”?

]]> By: MattS https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/05/bringing-monkey-courthouse-purse-read/comment-page-1/#comment-345856 Sun, 28 May 2017 18:02:30 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=64654#comment-345856 She put a live animal through a security x-ray. Does she need an emotional-support monkey because it’s smarter than she is?

]]>