<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: July 5 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/july-5-roundup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/july-5-roundup-2/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/july-5-roundup-2/comment-page-1/#comment-346208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65082#comment-346208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Facebook--I don&#039;t see why an entity that has not agreed to keep things quiet has any obligation, in a free society, not to disclose truthful information about the workings of government.  I understand that there is a law enforcement motive, but I don&#039;t see how that passes the &quot;so what?&quot; test.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Facebook&#8211;I don&#8217;t see why an entity that has not agreed to keep things quiet has any obligation, in a free society, not to disclose truthful information about the workings of government.  I understand that there is a law enforcement motive, but I don&#8217;t see how that passes the &#8220;so what?&#8221; test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
