<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Banking and finance roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/banking-finance-roundup-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/banking-finance-roundup-39/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 16:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/banking-finance-roundup-39/comment-page-1/#comment-346622</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65567#comment-346622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The article on military credit mentioned again how many US families lack even the cash savings for a minor emergency. Back when I was growing up in the 1960s, regulated banks welcomed and even paid interest on small savings accounts. Today&#039;s deregulated banks don&#039;t want the business, discouraging small savers with substantial fees.  They take the cash home, where likely as not it will be dissipated by importunate relatives or roommates.

I favor a common foreign idea of setting up post offices to handle simple small savings accounts.  (We would have to be vigilant to prevent mission creep into business properly belonging to commercial banks.)  On a previous occasion when I mentioned the idea, a fellow poster asked me how I would make it pay.  I answer that it should be subsidized if necessary as basic infrastructure, like free universal primary and secondary education.  Income tax laws could also be updated to encourage a start in savings. I suspect this would be more cost-effective than some other social programs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article on military credit mentioned again how many US families lack even the cash savings for a minor emergency. Back when I was growing up in the 1960s, regulated banks welcomed and even paid interest on small savings accounts. Today&#8217;s deregulated banks don&#8217;t want the business, discouraging small savers with substantial fees.  They take the cash home, where likely as not it will be dissipated by importunate relatives or roommates.</p>
<p>I favor a common foreign idea of setting up post offices to handle simple small savings accounts.  (We would have to be vigilant to prevent mission creep into business properly belonging to commercial banks.)  On a previous occasion when I mentioned the idea, a fellow poster asked me how I would make it pay.  I answer that it should be subsidized if necessary as basic infrastructure, like free universal primary and secondary education.  Income tax laws could also be updated to encourage a start in savings. I suspect this would be more cost-effective than some other social programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: great unknown		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/banking-finance-roundup-39/comment-page-1/#comment-346611</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[great unknown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65567#comment-346611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good that both the Tenth and DOJ have choked the life out of Operation Choke Point.  The DOJ decision, in the short term, since that is subject to political whim.  The Court decision, however, will probably have longer-lasting effects.

In a way, it&#039;s a shame this happened now.  I would very much have enjoyed having choke-point methodology applied to any bank that provided loans to political parties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good that both the Tenth and DOJ have choked the life out of Operation Choke Point.  The DOJ decision, in the short term, since that is subject to political whim.  The Court decision, however, will probably have longer-lasting effects.</p>
<p>In a way, it&#8217;s a shame this happened now.  I would very much have enjoyed having choke-point methodology applied to any bank that provided loans to political parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
