<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knowledge of the law is no excuse, FDCPA edition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/knowledge-law-no-excuse-fdcpa-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/knowledge-law-no-excuse-fdcpa-edition/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 20:25:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Heresolong		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/knowledge-law-no-excuse-fdcpa-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-346548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heresolong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65768#comment-346548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m guessing that this will (should?) be overturned by SCOTUS. How can you hold someone liable for following the law as written/interpreted at the time?  And Gregory, I think you hit the nail on the head there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing that this will (should?) be overturned by SCOTUS. How can you hold someone liable for following the law as written/interpreted at the time?  And Gregory, I think you hit the nail on the head there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gregory M Dwyer		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/knowledge-law-no-excuse-fdcpa-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-346543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory M Dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 14:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65768#comment-346543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m guessing that if it was the government itself who was following precedent, the courts would not have made it retroactive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing that if it was the government itself who was following precedent, the courts would not have made it retroactive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Canvasback		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/knowledge-law-no-excuse-fdcpa-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-346538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canvasback]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 01:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65768#comment-346538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It just seems clumsy to make it retroactive. Blatt et. al. are facing penalties. The article didn&#039;t mention other cases that may be affected. It would have been cleaner to reverse their earlier decision and allow Blatt to re-file.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just seems clumsy to make it retroactive. Blatt et. al. are facing penalties. The article didn&#8217;t mention other cases that may be affected. It would have been cleaner to reverse their earlier decision and allow Blatt to re-file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
