<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Social media liberty roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 19:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David C		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-346485</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65196#comment-346485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-346478&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt;.

Google has a presence in Canada, and if they don&#039;t comply then presumably they could be found in contempt.  The Canadian courts couldn&#039;t come after Google&#039;s US assets, but they could come after any of their Canadian assets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-346478">James</a>.</p>
<p>Google has a presence in Canada, and if they don&#8217;t comply then presumably they could be found in contempt.  The Canadian courts couldn&#8217;t come after Google&#8217;s US assets, but they could come after any of their Canadian assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-346478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 00:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65196#comment-346478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How does a Canadian court propose to enforce its order outside of Canada?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does a Canadian court propose to enforce its order outside of Canada?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gasman		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/08/social-media-liberty-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-346476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gasman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65196#comment-346476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Washington law bans repeated online posts intended to ‘embarrass’ anyone”

From the television show HeeHaw:   &quot;...you&#039;ll never hear one of us repeating gossip!

So you&#039;d better be sure and listen close the first time.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Washington law bans repeated online posts intended to ‘embarrass’ anyone”</p>
<p>From the television show HeeHaw:   &#8220;&#8230;you&#8217;ll never hear one of us repeating gossip!</p>
<p>So you&#8217;d better be sure and listen close the first time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
