<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Defamation suit after being called patent troll	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/09/defamation-suit-called-patent-troll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/09/defamation-suit-called-patent-troll/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cecil		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/09/defamation-suit-called-patent-troll/comment-page-1/#comment-346775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cecil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66138#comment-346775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How did they obtain a patent in the first place?  Back in the 90&#039;s, ATM&#039;s ran on OS/2 from IBM.  Changing it from one transport/protocol was simply a matter of changing the config which was well known and published.  Require security on that transaction?  Look at the RFC&#039;s for IP.  I am tired of the moron reviewers at the PTO that think &quot;on the internet&quot; is something new/different.  Back in the 70&#039;s, they intended all sorts of things to be done &quot;on the internet with a computer&quot;.  :D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did they obtain a patent in the first place?  Back in the 90&#8217;s, ATM&#8217;s ran on OS/2 from IBM.  Changing it from one transport/protocol was simply a matter of changing the config which was well known and published.  Require security on that transaction?  Look at the RFC&#8217;s for IP.  I am tired of the moron reviewers at the PTO that think &#8220;on the internet&#8221; is something new/different.  Back in the 70&#8217;s, they intended all sorts of things to be done &#8220;on the internet with a computer&#8221;.  😀</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
