<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Campus free speech roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/campus-free-speech-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/campus-free-speech-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: gasman		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/campus-free-speech-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-347137</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gasman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66729#comment-347137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Will the new rules themselves improperly restrict speech? &quot;

Maybe, but worth the experiment.
Not all sounds emanating from a vocal tract can be construed to be speech.  Shout-downs are behaviors, more than speech, intended to impeded another&#039;s speech rights.  Because the speech content of a shout-down is often irrelevant to the effect that it has, words that might be present in the sound stream are little different than what might come from an air horn.  
A restriction on shout-downs might easily be written to be content neutral, and stated to have the goal of fostering an environment of debate and exchange.   Or it might be written badly.  Let&#039;s see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will the new rules themselves improperly restrict speech? &#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe, but worth the experiment.<br />
Not all sounds emanating from a vocal tract can be construed to be speech.  Shout-downs are behaviors, more than speech, intended to impeded another&#8217;s speech rights.  Because the speech content of a shout-down is often irrelevant to the effect that it has, words that might be present in the sound stream are little different than what might come from an air horn.<br />
A restriction on shout-downs might easily be written to be content neutral, and stated to have the goal of fostering an environment of debate and exchange.   Or it might be written badly.  Let&#8217;s see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
