<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Free speech roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/free-speech-roundup-80/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/free-speech-roundup-80/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/free-speech-roundup-80/comment-page-1/#comment-347087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66095#comment-347087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/free-speech-roundup-80/comment-page-1/#comment-347086&quot;&gt;Another Guy named Dan&lt;/a&gt;.

That is surprising, Another Guy. No one I know of in free-market circles defends the public interest standard of review. When we condemn Trump for his wretched threats, we take for granted that the standard is a dangerous weapon that should not be entrusted to other vengeful presidents either. 

I hope you will carry this message to the other, different circles in which you have encountered condemnations of Trump over these remarks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/free-speech-roundup-80/comment-page-1/#comment-347086">Another Guy named Dan</a>.</p>
<p>That is surprising, Another Guy. No one I know of in free-market circles defends the public interest standard of review. When we condemn Trump for his wretched threats, we take for granted that the standard is a dangerous weapon that should not be entrusted to other vengeful presidents either. </p>
<p>I hope you will carry this message to the other, different circles in which you have encountered condemnations of Trump over these remarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Guy named Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/10/free-speech-roundup-80/comment-page-1/#comment-347086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Guy named Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66095#comment-347086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it interesting that in the dozens of condemnations of Trump for threatening broadcast licenses of those with whom he disagrees, not one has included a proposal to do away with the Public Interest clause that is used to carry out these threats.

It&#039;s almost as though they believe that the club should exist, but Trump should not be the one allowed to swing it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that in the dozens of condemnations of Trump for threatening broadcast licenses of those with whom he disagrees, not one has included a proposal to do away with the Public Interest clause that is used to carry out these threats.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost as though they believe that the club should exist, but Trump should not be the one allowed to swing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
