<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Free speech roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/free-speech-roundup-81/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/free-speech-roundup-81/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 13:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cecil		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/free-speech-roundup-81/comment-page-1/#comment-347186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cecil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 13:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66837#comment-347186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t the russians free to speak and advertise too?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t the russians free to speak and advertise too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gasman		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/free-speech-roundup-81/comment-page-1/#comment-347185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gasman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 11:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66837#comment-347185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Before deep-pocket publications can report on sexual misconduct by persons in high places, gauntlet of legal review needs to be run with special attention to on-the-record sources&quot;
Not just Gawker, but Rolling Stone.  In cases where the accusation is for the most part the entire case, no forensics and when old enough to predate social media likely little supportive evidence, then witness credibility is essential before painting someone with what will be an enduring internet smear to their reputation and wellbeing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Before deep-pocket publications can report on sexual misconduct by persons in high places, gauntlet of legal review needs to be run with special attention to on-the-record sources&#8221;<br />
Not just Gawker, but Rolling Stone.  In cases where the accusation is for the most part the entire case, no forensics and when old enough to predate social media likely little supportive evidence, then witness credibility is essential before painting someone with what will be an enduring internet smear to their reputation and wellbeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
