<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Senate hearing on litigation reform	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/senate-hearing-litigation-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/senate-hearing-litigation-reform/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:45:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Moving Target		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/11/senate-hearing-litigation-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-347281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moving Target]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67247#comment-347281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;It would make sanctions mandatory against attorneys who file frivolous lawsuits. Currently, judges have discretion on whether to impose sanctions.&quot;  Doesn&#039;t that just shift the &quot;judge&#039;s discretion&quot; point from whether to impose sanctions, to whether to determine that a suit is frivolous?  Or is there an objective, applicable standard that a judge won&#039;t be able to escape?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It would make sanctions mandatory against attorneys who file frivolous lawsuits. Currently, judges have discretion on whether to impose sanctions.&#8221;  Doesn&#8217;t that just shift the &#8220;judge&#8217;s discretion&#8221; point from whether to impose sanctions, to whether to determine that a suit is frivolous?  Or is there an objective, applicable standard that a judge won&#8217;t be able to escape?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
