<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 06:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 06:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66737#comment-347415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347413&quot;&gt;CarLitGuy&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;But then, I may be a cynic.&quot;

Justifiably, in my opinion, in this case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347413">CarLitGuy</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;But then, I may be a cynic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Justifiably, in my opinion, in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CarLitGuy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarLitGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66737#comment-347413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347411&quot;&gt;D&lt;/a&gt;.

a &quot;boundless&quot; art is hard to draw lines around, and this case is all about arbitrary line drawing.  I suspect the court will rule in a fractured way, but ultimately conclude that baking a cake isn&#039;t protected, nor is &quot;generic&quot; run of the mill decoration (pick from our catalog of options...), but that custom writing, decorations (the groom and groom or bride and bride silhouettes, etc) etc will be protected, much like with the screen printers.  The court will no doubt assure us that they have pronounced a workable standard, and the lesser courts will no doubt each interpret that standard diffferently, while individual judges largely rule in accordance with their (dis)agreement as to the message conveyed.

But then, I may be a cynic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347411">D</a>.</p>
<p>a &#8220;boundless&#8221; art is hard to draw lines around, and this case is all about arbitrary line drawing.  I suspect the court will rule in a fractured way, but ultimately conclude that baking a cake isn&#8217;t protected, nor is &#8220;generic&#8221; run of the mill decoration (pick from our catalog of options&#8230;), but that custom writing, decorations (the groom and groom or bride and bride silhouettes, etc) etc will be protected, much like with the screen printers.  The court will no doubt assure us that they have pronounced a workable standard, and the lesser courts will no doubt each interpret that standard diffferently, while individual judges largely rule in accordance with their (dis)agreement as to the message conveyed.</p>
<p>But then, I may be a cynic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MF		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66737#comment-347412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The headline for Silvester v. Becerra:  &quot;Ninth Circuit errs on individual gun rights, SCOTUS should correct&quot;  Heck, if you took that quote and removed &#039;individual gun rights&#039;, you&#039;d be right on nearly every case the Ninth Circuit decides.  Just save it as a fill-in-the-blank:  &quot;Ninth Circuit errors on _________________, SCOTUS should correct.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline for Silvester v. Becerra:  &#8220;Ninth Circuit errs on individual gun rights, SCOTUS should correct&#8221;  Heck, if you took that quote and removed &#8216;individual gun rights&#8217;, you&#8217;d be right on nearly every case the Ninth Circuit decides.  Just save it as a fill-in-the-blank:  &#8220;Ninth Circuit errors on _________________, SCOTUS should correct.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/supreme-court-roundup-22/comment-page-1/#comment-347411</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=66737#comment-347411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apparently George Will does not agree with the art community and their supporters - that art in its various expressed forms has no bounds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently George Will does not agree with the art community and their supporters &#8211; that art in its various expressed forms has no bounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
