<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: Philly council approves shop Plexiglass crackdown	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/update-philly-council-approves-shop-plexiglass-crackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/update-philly-council-approves-shop-plexiglass-crackdown/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:41:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/update-philly-council-approves-shop-plexiglass-crackdown/comment-page-1/#comment-347568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67843#comment-347568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The question has come up with proposed bans on body armor; I believe the courts have not been welcoming toward efforts to include passive defense in &quot;arms.&quot;  Note however Eugene Volokh’s argument that a right of self-defense may be implicit in the U.S. Constitution as an unenumerated right, as it is explicit under many state constitutions. That was mentioned with a link in the December 14 post linked above:

https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/philadelphia-may-ban-bulletproof-glass-delis/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question has come up with proposed bans on body armor; I believe the courts have not been welcoming toward efforts to include passive defense in &#8220;arms.&#8221;  Note however Eugene Volokh’s argument that a right of self-defense may be implicit in the U.S. Constitution as an unenumerated right, as it is explicit under many state constitutions. That was mentioned with a link in the December 14 post linked above:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/philadelphia-may-ban-bulletproof-glass-delis/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/philadelphia-may-ban-bulletproof-glass-delis/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Poser		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/update-philly-council-approves-shop-plexiglass-crackdown/comment-page-1/#comment-347566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Poser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67843#comment-347566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is there a 2nd amendment right to use passive defensive measures such as bulletproof glass and body armor?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a 2nd amendment right to use passive defensive measures such as bulletproof glass and body armor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
