<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Medical roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/medical-roundup-58/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/medical-roundup-58/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 05:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/medical-roundup-58/comment-page-1/#comment-348071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 05:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67944#comment-348071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Malpractice cases v. drug/device cases

Two interesting SCotUS decisions on this subject.

Wyeth v. Levine, decided 2009
Musician Diana Levine lost her arm to blatant malpractice at a poorly insured Vermont clinic, and was allowed to keep a $6.7 award against drug manufacturer Wyeth.  Wyeth had used an FDA-approved label, but SCotUS 
allowed Vermont courts and juries to speculate that a different State label might somehow have caught the health technician&#039;s attention.

Pliva v. Mensing, decided 2011
Some patients suffered bad effects from longterm use of generic metoproclamide.  SCotUS did not allow them to sue the generic manufacturer for defective labeling, because Congress, in allowing and encouraging the manufacture of generic drugs, specifically *required* generic manufacturers to use the same label as the original manufacturer.

The NY Times and other friends of the plaintiffs&#039; bar decried Pliva v Mensing as terrible, leaving patients with bad outcomes without legal resource.  I suggested that government could more cheaply and fairly backstop clinics with poor insurance, either with automatic government insurance, or a Workmen&#039;s Comp-style system of direct payments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malpractice cases v. drug/device cases</p>
<p>Two interesting SCotUS decisions on this subject.</p>
<p>Wyeth v. Levine, decided 2009<br />
Musician Diana Levine lost her arm to blatant malpractice at a poorly insured Vermont clinic, and was allowed to keep a $6.7 award against drug manufacturer Wyeth.  Wyeth had used an FDA-approved label, but SCotUS<br />
allowed Vermont courts and juries to speculate that a different State label might somehow have caught the health technician&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>Pliva v. Mensing, decided 2011<br />
Some patients suffered bad effects from longterm use of generic metoproclamide.  SCotUS did not allow them to sue the generic manufacturer for defective labeling, because Congress, in allowing and encouraging the manufacture of generic drugs, specifically *required* generic manufacturers to use the same label as the original manufacturer.</p>
<p>The NY Times and other friends of the plaintiffs&#8217; bar decried Pliva v Mensing as terrible, leaving patients with bad outcomes without legal resource.  I suggested that government could more cheaply and fairly backstop clinics with poor insurance, either with automatic government insurance, or a Workmen&#8217;s Comp-style system of direct payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/medical-roundup-58/comment-page-1/#comment-348067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67944#comment-348067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I swear I heard Gov. Malloy say on radio today that &quot;The only reason to prescribe an opioid is if you want your patient to become addicted.&quot;

But I can find no record of his saying it, not even on CT.gov, at the Malloy web page.  

Our Governor is really enjoying his lame-duck status.  I&#039;m not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear I heard Gov. Malloy say on radio today that &#8220;The only reason to prescribe an opioid is if you want your patient to become addicted.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I can find no record of his saying it, not even on CT.gov, at the Malloy web page.  </p>
<p>Our Governor is really enjoying his lame-duck status.  I&#8217;m not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/medical-roundup-58/comment-page-1/#comment-348065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67944#comment-348065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Comrade Stalin had some even more pertinent points to make about the medical profession:

http://www.cyberussr.com/rus/vrach-ubijca-e.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade Stalin had some even more pertinent points to make about the medical profession:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cyberussr.com/rus/vrach-ubijca-e.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cyberussr.com/rus/vrach-ubijca-e.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
