<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NYC: 5Pointz building owner must pay graffiti artists	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/nyc-5pointz-building-owner-must-pay-graffiti-artists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/nyc-5pointz-building-owner-must-pay-graffiti-artists/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/nyc-5pointz-building-owner-must-pay-graffiti-artists/comment-page-1/#comment-348034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=68990#comment-348034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The $6.7 million apparently was an acceptable cost of doing business for a $200 million project, to avert the risk that the artists could sue and get their work declared an unchangeable monument.  I would have preferred that the building owner wait a few months (when as the court pointed out he lacked the permits anyways), giving the artists a few weeks or months to relocate their work.  But did the developer have a rational fear that the graffiti could delay his project in court for expensive months or even years?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $6.7 million apparently was an acceptable cost of doing business for a $200 million project, to avert the risk that the artists could sue and get their work declared an unchangeable monument.  I would have preferred that the building owner wait a few months (when as the court pointed out he lacked the permits anyways), giving the artists a few weeks or months to relocate their work.  But did the developer have a rational fear that the graffiti could delay his project in court for expensive months or even years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Douglas2		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/nyc-5pointz-building-owner-must-pay-graffiti-artists/comment-page-1/#comment-348022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=68990#comment-348022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your understated just-the-facts-ma&#039;am report, with link to &quot;more on VARA&quot;, does far more justice to the controversy than most reporting I&#039;ve seen.

My perception is that those who were itching to enshrine &quot;moral rights&quot; of artists into US law had very little concept of the perverse incentives they were setting up.

VARA &quot;worked out well&quot; for the artists in this case, but for many of them the foreseeable consequence of this award&#039;s notoriety will spell the end of their muraling career.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your understated just-the-facts-ma&#8217;am report, with link to &#8220;more on VARA&#8221;, does far more justice to the controversy than most reporting I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>My perception is that those who were itching to enshrine &#8220;moral rights&#8221; of artists into US law had very little concept of the perverse incentives they were setting up.</p>
<p>VARA &#8220;worked out well&#8221; for the artists in this case, but for many of them the foreseeable consequence of this award&#8217;s notoriety will spell the end of their muraling career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
