https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/medical-roundup-59/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:31:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/medical-roundup-59/comment-page-1/#comment-348267 Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:31:04 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=69106#comment-348267 The regulations require a health care provider to either notify the patient or bring a motion for a protective order before releasing information in response to a subpoena not issued by a court. Not really a catch 22. In my state, the patient must already be notified before a party issued subpoena is served.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/medical-roundup-59/comment-page-1/#comment-348261 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:18:17 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=69106#comment-348261 Regarding the Connecticut case: if this isn’t a legal version of a Catch-22 (or darned if you do, darned if you don’t)….seems to me the doctor’s lawyer should win this on appeal to a higher court (it’s a shame he couldn’t haul the state Supreme Court up to get Rule 11 sanctions against the entire Court).

]]>