<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Unions explore ways to dodge Janus in advance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/unions-explore-ways-to-dodge-janus-in-advance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/unions-explore-ways-to-dodge-janus-in-advance/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David C		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/unions-explore-ways-to-dodge-janus-in-advance/comment-page-1/#comment-348346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=69657#comment-348346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/unions-explore-ways-to-dodge-janus-in-advance/comment-page-1/#comment-348338&quot;&gt;PaulB&lt;/a&gt;.

If the government was just getting out of the business and letting people be their own employers, that would be fine.  But that&#039;s not exactly what they are doing.  I gather that they are forming a semi-private entity that the home health workers will be forced to be a part of (if they want to keep their career.)  

It won&#039;t be truly privatized.  Full privatization would allow individual workers to form their own companies and not unionize themselves, and the union-backed politicians don&#039;t want to allow that.  This semi-privatization isn&#039;t going to lower costs; the article says Washington State’s Office of Fiscal Management actually.expects costs to &lt;em&gt;rise&lt;/em&gt; by $11 million.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/unions-explore-ways-to-dodge-janus-in-advance/comment-page-1/#comment-348338">PaulB</a>.</p>
<p>If the government was just getting out of the business and letting people be their own employers, that would be fine.  But that&#8217;s not exactly what they are doing.  I gather that they are forming a semi-private entity that the home health workers will be forced to be a part of (if they want to keep their career.)  </p>
<p>It won&#8217;t be truly privatized.  Full privatization would allow individual workers to form their own companies and not unionize themselves, and the union-backed politicians don&#8217;t want to allow that.  This semi-privatization isn&#8217;t going to lower costs; the article says Washington State’s Office of Fiscal Management actually.expects costs to <em>rise</em> by $11 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PaulB		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/03/unions-explore-ways-to-dodge-janus-in-advance/comment-page-1/#comment-348338</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=69657#comment-348338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a great idea.  Then we&#039;ll solve the burden of public sector pension and retiree health care costs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great idea.  Then we&#8217;ll solve the burden of public sector pension and retiree health care costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
