<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Environmental journalism, brought to you by the EPA	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/environmental-journalism-brought-to-you-by-the-epa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/environmental-journalism-brought-to-you-by-the-epa/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 23:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Should the EPA fund the Chesapeake Bay Journal? &#124; Free State Notes		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/environmental-journalism-brought-to-you-by-the-epa/comment-page-1/#comment-348619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should the EPA fund the Chesapeake Bay Journal? &#124; Free State Notes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 23:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=68562#comment-348619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I like advocacy journalism as well as the next fellow — at least I consume a lot of it as a reader. That doesn’t mean the federal government should be funding it, thereby giving a boost to one side of environmental debates in the mid-Atlantic region. My new piece for the DC Examiner examines the Environmental Protection Agency’s longstanding subsidies for the influential Chesapeake Bay Journal. (cross-posted from Overlawyered) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I like advocacy journalism as well as the next fellow — at least I consume a lot of it as a reader. That doesn’t mean the federal government should be funding it, thereby giving a boost to one side of environmental debates in the mid-Atlantic region. My new piece for the DC Examiner examines the Environmental Protection Agency’s longstanding subsidies for the influential Chesapeake Bay Journal. (cross-posted from Overlawyered) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
