<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fifth Circuit overturns $151 million Mark Lanier verdict	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/05/fifth-circuit-overturns-151-million-mark-lanier-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/05/fifth-circuit-overturns-151-million-mark-lanier-verdict/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 12:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: thufir_hawat		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/05/fifth-circuit-overturns-151-million-mark-lanier-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-348661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thufir_hawat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 12:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=70276#comment-348661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another point in the opinion: defendants elicited testimony regarding their corporate culture and marketing practices, painting a picture of themselves as “wonderful people doing wonderful things.” As a result, the district court allowed inflammatory character evidence against defendants - including claims of race discrimination and bribes to Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi “regime” - as defendants&#039; character testimony had “opened the door.” Absurd, given, inter alia, that the defendant owned more than 265 companies in 60 countries. “[T]he Rules of Evidence do not simply evaporate when one party opens the door on an issue.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point in the opinion: defendants elicited testimony regarding their corporate culture and marketing practices, painting a picture of themselves as “wonderful people doing wonderful things.” As a result, the district court allowed inflammatory character evidence against defendants &#8211; including claims of race discrimination and bribes to Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi “regime” &#8211; as defendants&#8217; character testimony had “opened the door.” Absurd, given, inter alia, that the defendant owned more than 265 companies in 60 countries. “[T]he Rules of Evidence do not simply evaporate when one party opens the door on an issue.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/05/fifth-circuit-overturns-151-million-mark-lanier-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-348657</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 11:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=70276#comment-348657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shouldn&#039;t the plaintiff&#039;s lawyer be disbarred?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyer be disbarred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
