<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What Not To Wear, Minnesota polling place edition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/what-not-to-wear-minnesota-polling-place-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/what-not-to-wear-minnesota-polling-place-edition/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Confounded. Befuddled.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/what-not-to-wear-minnesota-polling-place-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-349064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Confounded. Befuddled.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=71200#comment-349064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I continue to be confounded and befuddled why people&#039;s default reaction to issues where the essential question is &quot;more or less freedom&quot; isn&#039;t -- why, more, of course!  Anytime a case ends up in court where a viable argument exists and freedom is on the side of that argument, I always wonder -- who in the hell are the people (Minnesota legislators, Colorado Civil Rights Commission, basically any public body in California) who are AGAINST freedom by putting this stuff into practice in the first place?  I am always confounded. And befuddled.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I continue to be confounded and befuddled why people&#8217;s default reaction to issues where the essential question is &#8220;more or less freedom&#8221; isn&#8217;t &#8212; why, more, of course!  Anytime a case ends up in court where a viable argument exists and freedom is on the side of that argument, I always wonder &#8212; who in the hell are the people (Minnesota legislators, Colorado Civil Rights Commission, basically any public body in California) who are AGAINST freedom by putting this stuff into practice in the first place?  I am always confounded. And befuddled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
