<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Biofuels mandate: a renewable road to ruin	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/biofuels-mandate-a-renewable-road-to-ruin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/biofuels-mandate-a-renewable-road-to-ruin/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dana Thompson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/biofuels-mandate-a-renewable-road-to-ruin/comment-page-1/#comment-351400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=72807#comment-351400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A release of sequestered carbon into the atmosphere may ultimately provide benefits, given the possibility of improved agricultural productivity and increased habitability of high-latitude regions. Such talk of course is forbidden, on pain of being cast into the category of denialist crank or industry shill. What&#039;s not beneficial is the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/nov/26/burning-food-crops-biofuels-crime-humanity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;impact on food prices and world hunger&lt;/a&gt; in the here-and-now.

Every 5 to 10 years there&#039;s a burst of public concern about the impact upon the poor of putting food in our fuel tanks. Then it&#039;s forgotten, only to arise later, as if it had never been thought of before.

Do you remember 25 years or so ago, how Mobil was pilloried in the press for pointing out that, net of fertilizer application and other energy-intensive inputs, growing corn to produce motor fuel additives actually increased fossil fuel emissions? That established the current paradigm: nowadays, environmentalism is simply something to make money off of, and no industry executive is going to risk being accused of &quot;hate speech&quot; or &quot;tampering with our democracy&quot; through ill-considered efforts to educate the public.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A release of sequestered carbon into the atmosphere may ultimately provide benefits, given the possibility of improved agricultural productivity and increased habitability of high-latitude regions. Such talk of course is forbidden, on pain of being cast into the category of denialist crank or industry shill. What&#8217;s not beneficial is the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/nov/26/burning-food-crops-biofuels-crime-humanity" rel="nofollow">impact on food prices and world hunger</a> in the here-and-now.</p>
<p>Every 5 to 10 years there&#8217;s a burst of public concern about the impact upon the poor of putting food in our fuel tanks. Then it&#8217;s forgotten, only to arise later, as if it had never been thought of before.</p>
<p>Do you remember 25 years or so ago, how Mobil was pilloried in the press for pointing out that, net of fertilizer application and other energy-intensive inputs, growing corn to produce motor fuel additives actually increased fossil fuel emissions? That established the current paradigm: nowadays, environmentalism is simply something to make money off of, and no industry executive is going to risk being accused of &#8220;hate speech&#8221; or &#8220;tampering with our democracy&#8221; through ill-considered efforts to educate the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/biofuels-mandate-a-renewable-road-to-ruin/comment-page-1/#comment-351399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=72807#comment-351399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1980s, I recall biofuels being sold not as an environmentalist measure, but rather as an alternative to dependence on oil from the volatile Middle East.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the 1980s, I recall biofuels being sold not as an environmentalist measure, but rather as an alternative to dependence on oil from the volatile Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
