Comments on: New York: maybe gun insurance is okay after all

By: cecil

cecil — Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:47:43 +0000

Speech insurance! C’mon, anyone wanting to communicate should be required to carry speech insurance. That anyone receiving hurt feelings can seek restitution. And, if your speech insurance gets enough claims they can drop your coverage and you will have to shut up and stop writing or communicating in any fashion.

By: D

Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:52:51 +0000

So once again we will be forced to buy a product we don’t want so we can exercise a right we already have? We have seen this rodeo before. Government has no right to impose something like that, but with enough guns of their own, they can make anything “legal”. You Sith wannabes.

By: Hugo S. Cunningham

Hugo S. Cunningham — Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:52:05 +0000

Some twenty years ago, I offered a mandatory gun insurance proposal on Usenet. It had some features that gun prohibitionists might not care for.

http://www.cyberussr.com/hcunn/guns/gun-insurance.html

By: greatUnknown

greatUnknown — Sun, 09 Dec 2018 23:04:46 +0000

No big deal; they’ll follow the Ninth Circuit philosophy that a constitutional right can be conditioned on impossible-to-meet standards.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/08/04/ninth-circuit-upholds-ca-microstamping-law-although-microstamping-doesnt-exist/

The fact that the standard is impossible to meet is because the government is making it so, only makes it sweeter.

By: Farside

Farside — Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:36:31 +0000

In New York, many police officers, parole officers, etc. have their own hand guns, in addition to their issued weapons. Will they be required to purchased insurance for their guns?