<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Free speech roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/free-speech-roundup-98/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/free-speech-roundup-98/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 17:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/free-speech-roundup-98/comment-page-1/#comment-353726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 17:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73080#comment-353726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Trump&#039;s open question re: news reporting/SNL  It&#039;s difficult not to have some sympathy for the President.  &quot;News&quot; reporting is slanted and biased and clearly favors the Democratic Party.  At some point, it is an electioneering issue.  But that is more of a problem for the electioneering laws than the conduct in question.  Or at least it should be.  

But one thing we need to make clear---Trump is by no means the worst offender when it comes to free speech issues.  Numerous Democrats, in the past, have threatened radio stations for running ads--&quot;Nice license you have there . . . .&quot;     

Trump is a bete noire.  That explains much of the outrage against him for somehow breaking norms.  And he deserves serious criticism for hinting that FEC laws should be brought to bear on the press or comedy (of course, I don&#039;t recall a lot of Dems getting upset about state go-go laws going after radio talk hosts for &quot;in kind&quot; contributions).  

Finally, and this does not absolve Trump, but let&#039;s not forget that his judicial appointments seem very solid on First Amendment issues--not sure we&#039;d be able to say that if HRC had been elected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Trump&#8217;s open question re: news reporting/SNL  It&#8217;s difficult not to have some sympathy for the President.  &#8220;News&#8221; reporting is slanted and biased and clearly favors the Democratic Party.  At some point, it is an electioneering issue.  But that is more of a problem for the electioneering laws than the conduct in question.  Or at least it should be.  </p>
<p>But one thing we need to make clear&#8212;Trump is by no means the worst offender when it comes to free speech issues.  Numerous Democrats, in the past, have threatened radio stations for running ads&#8211;&#8220;Nice license you have there . . . .&#8221;     </p>
<p>Trump is a bete noire.  That explains much of the outrage against him for somehow breaking norms.  And he deserves serious criticism for hinting that FEC laws should be brought to bear on the press or comedy (of course, I don&#8217;t recall a lot of Dems getting upset about state go-go laws going after radio talk hosts for &#8220;in kind&#8221; contributions).  </p>
<p>Finally, and this does not absolve Trump, but let&#8217;s not forget that his judicial appointments seem very solid on First Amendment issues&#8211;not sure we&#8217;d be able to say that if HRC had been elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/free-speech-roundup-98/comment-page-1/#comment-353720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73080#comment-353720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re:  Federal Magistrate.   Good for the Sun-Times to ignore the judge&#039;s order.  The Supreme Court should declare that judges&#039; orders like those are a brutum fulmen and can and should be ignored.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Federal Magistrate.   Good for the Sun-Times to ignore the judge&#8217;s order.  The Supreme Court should declare that judges&#8217; orders like those are a brutum fulmen and can and should be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
