<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On Xarelto, plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers win by losing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/on-xarelto-plaintiffs-lawyers-win-by-losing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/on-xarelto-plaintiffs-lawyers-win-by-losing/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:20:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronald V. Miller, Jr.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/on-xarelto-plaintiffs-lawyers-win-by-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-353876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald V. Miller, Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73143#comment-353876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article is nonsense. Incredibly, it left out a $28 million verdict against these companies with a huge punitive damage award.  The fact that an appellate court flipped it on appeals has nothing to do with the predictive value of a verdict which tells these companies they behaved awfully.  

If you these cases lack scientific merit, that&#039;s fine.  There is some science to support your position.  But to pretend that they have been &quot;crushing on the battlefield&quot; or whatever nonsense he spewed when a jury has already given a verdict in a single case that 4% in a single case of the settled value of 25,000 cases, you really don&#039;t have much interest in doing anything other than being an industry shill.  What is fine, too. But let&#039;s call it what it is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is nonsense. Incredibly, it left out a $28 million verdict against these companies with a huge punitive damage award.  The fact that an appellate court flipped it on appeals has nothing to do with the predictive value of a verdict which tells these companies they behaved awfully.  </p>
<p>If you these cases lack scientific merit, that&#8217;s fine.  There is some science to support your position.  But to pretend that they have been &#8220;crushing on the battlefield&#8221; or whatever nonsense he spewed when a jury has already given a verdict in a single case that 4% in a single case of the settled value of 25,000 cases, you really don&#8217;t have much interest in doing anything other than being an industry shill.  What is fine, too. But let&#8217;s call it what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Linda		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/04/on-xarelto-plaintiffs-lawyers-win-by-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-353790</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 17:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73143#comment-353790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t win on fighting drug companies.  Follow the money and everyone involved. It&#039;s a big joke with the FDA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t win on fighting drug companies.  Follow the money and everyone involved. It&#8217;s a big joke with the FDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
