<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Crime and punishment roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 14:26:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 14:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73291#comment-354693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354684&quot;&gt;captnhal&lt;/a&gt;.

Could NY argue that if Trump gave the subject a *preemptive* pardon (like Ford for Nixon), before the subject had been charged for anything, that the subject had never been &quot;put in [Federal] jeopardy&quot; in the Constitutional sense?

If so, there might be some interesting gamesmanship, with Trump initiating prosecutions of allies simply in order to ensure that pardons would have substance.

Also, is NY trying to criminalize matters that are not properly in a State&#039;s jurisdiction?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354684">captnhal</a>.</p>
<p>Could NY argue that if Trump gave the subject a *preemptive* pardon (like Ford for Nixon), before the subject had been charged for anything, that the subject had never been &#8220;put in [Federal] jeopardy&#8221; in the Constitutional sense?</p>
<p>If so, there might be some interesting gamesmanship, with Trump initiating prosecutions of allies simply in order to ensure that pardons would have substance.</p>
<p>Also, is NY trying to criminalize matters that are not properly in a State&#8217;s jurisdiction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: captnhal		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[captnhal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73291#comment-354684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354657&quot;&gt;SPO&lt;/a&gt;.

Would the NY law pass the constitutionality test?  Double jeopardy laws seem like a slam dunk fail or am I missing something?.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354657">SPO</a>.</p>
<p>Would the NY law pass the constitutionality test?  Double jeopardy laws seem like a slam dunk fail or am I missing something?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354657</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 16:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73291#comment-354657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The NY law also seems to have an ex post facto problem.  And an Equal Protection Problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NY law also seems to have an ex post facto problem.  And an Equal Protection Problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gasman		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/crime-and-punishment-roundup-13/comment-page-1/#comment-354656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gasman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73291#comment-354656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;... a public registry of people caught paying or attempting to pay for sex...&quot;

And how about a public registry of state employees who offer to provide sex in exchange for money.  This of course would include the undercover police officers trolling for Johns.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; a public registry of people caught paying or attempting to pay for sex&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>And how about a public registry of state employees who offer to provide sex in exchange for money.  This of course would include the undercover police officers trolling for Johns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
