<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Great moments in qualified immunity	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/great-moments-in-qualified-immunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/great-moments-in-qualified-immunity/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 15:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/great-moments-in-qualified-immunity/comment-page-1/#comment-354655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73289#comment-354655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/great-moments-in-qualified-immunity/comment-page-1/#comment-354617&quot;&gt;David C&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, that&#039;s a good point. Not all abuses by government officials, even when flagrant, necessarily violate the Bill of Rights, and there is no indication that California law is so structured as to deny the owners any hope of a civil remedy. .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/great-moments-in-qualified-immunity/comment-page-1/#comment-354617">David C</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s a good point. Not all abuses by government officials, even when flagrant, necessarily violate the Bill of Rights, and there is no indication that California law is so structured as to deny the owners any hope of a civil remedy. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David C		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/great-moments-in-qualified-immunity/comment-page-1/#comment-354617</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 18:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73289#comment-354617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is only half as outrageous as it sounds. Assuming the officers stole the money, their actions were a crime and a tort. That doesn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;necessarily&lt;/em&gt; mean it&#039;s a 4th Amendment violation, especially if the warrant gave them the right to seize the money. The victim (assuming the statute of limitations hasn&#039;t run out) could possibly sue in state court for theft, instead of in federal court for constitutional violations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only half as outrageous as it sounds. Assuming the officers stole the money, their actions were a crime and a tort. That doesn&#8217;t <em>necessarily</em> mean it&#8217;s a 4th Amendment violation, especially if the warrant gave them the right to seize the money. The victim (assuming the statute of limitations hasn&#8217;t run out) could possibly sue in state court for theft, instead of in federal court for constitutional violations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
